Thrawn Rickle 34
Press Responsibility
© 1993 Williscroft |
|
|
Freedom
of the press is a cherished American tradition and one of the major foundations
of the freedom we enjoy in this country. Most Americans understand that every
freedom we enjoy carries a commensurate responsibility. Nevertheless, as I
have observed press coverage of the Gulf conflict, I begin to wonder if the
American press corps fully understands this principle. During
a recent Scud missile attack on Tel Aviv, several individuals were severely
injured - some died. The attack came during darkness, while people slept. Many
expected incoming missiles to be stopped by newly installed defense systems. The
unexpected explosion was, therefore, even more devastating. Rescue
personnel desperately worked to save the lives of injured civilians, hampered
by fallen building parts, spraying water from broken mains, exposed
electrical wiring, the possibility of gas—domestic and poison, and by the
news media. Reporters and cameras were everywhere in the ensuing melee. Rescue
workers vainly attempted to keep reporters outside the immediate scene of
action. Gushing wounds, severe trauma, heart failures—these kinds of problems
require total concentration of effort by emergency medical people. Those
heroes did not need a camera thrust into the face of a dying victim. The
world has a right to know, but only when that right does not interfere with
saving lives and immediate damage control. Another
aspect of news media irresponsibility is the adversarial role it has assumed
with respect to our military’s prosecution of the Gulf war. I remind news
media members that they are not journalists who happen to be Americans, they
are Americans who happen to be journalists. The successful prosecution of
this war with minimum loss of American life is not only the military’s concern,
it is the concern of all Americans, including members of the news media. I am
tired of whining journalistic response to security restrictions on reporting.
A journalist has no more right than any other individual to know the
specifics of a particular operation. The reasons for security restrictions on
certain kinds of information are patently obvious. It takes neither keen
intellect nor special understanding to comprehend this. A
reporter who ferrets out a piece of military intelligence and reports it, the
network that carries the report, and the news media members who applaud these
efforts—all are equally responsible and should be held accountable for any
ensuing advantage to the enemy or damage to American interests; and should a
single American be hurt or killed resulting from this irresponsible behavior,
the culpable individuals should be brought to swift justice. Freedom
of speech does not grant license to shout “Fire!” in a crowded theater, and
neither does freedom of the press grant any right to endanger American lives
recklessly and irresponsibly. It is
past time for American citizens to explain these simple facts clearly and
succinctly to those members of the press corps who seem to have missed
several important lessons in their high school civics classes. We are neither amused nor impressed. Get your collective acts together! |
|